cheap ugg bootsThe reporter rushed to the e-commerce are taobao

The reporter rushed to the e-commerce are taobao.com, headquarters of Hangzhou survey. Hangzhou Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce Binjiang District branch responsible for online trademark infringement processing pan Jie interview. He said, " UGG " is a registered trademark of the United States of America DEX. In recent years, along with the snow boots sold, and " UGG " trademark infringement case rapid rise related. But " UGG " in concept and Australian sheepskin boots ( known in China as the ugg boots ) known, the objective to increase the complexity of the event judgment.
 
Panj also said, to determine whether tort, is it right? It legally registered trademark, and have illegal use. If it is not a registered trademark, is to see whether it and other registered trademarks of conflict, the same or similar. For example, a merchant, a registered trademark does not "UGG" the inscription, but feel free to use, it may intrude into " UGG " trademark right. Any of a formal operating company, should respect the " UGG" is a registered trademark of the company of Texas fact. But never say you do snow boots product, violated its exclusive right of trademark.For many years engaged in bilateral trade Lee was confirmed by UGG originated from Australia, Australia has a plurality of " UGG " brand. The reporter logs onto the Australian intellectual property official website, found with the inscription "UGG" registered trademark for the number of full screen; later on Australian wool testing Bureau official website, confirmed that the body to all snow boots manufacturers inspection report called " Ugg boots ". The reporter interviewed the two Australian background and have a certain impact on the snow boots brand JUMBOUGG and Yellow Eeath, two companies of the China market is responsible for per capita expressed indignation, that the report was misleading. JUMBOUGG Mr. Yuan thinks, a lot of Australia ugg boots brand in the domestic trademark with a separate " UGG" the inscription, before entering Chinese market, not to Dekkers's trademark conflicts, mostly is modified or changed mark mark. Through the China Trademark Bureau to review and get registered trademark certificate are legal trademark. And we employ their own intellectual property rights experts, use of a trademark by strictly abide by the " people's Republic of China Trademark Law " the relevant provisions. The report cited Dirks Chinese market for Ms. Wang 's words, "DEX enjoy UGG trademark exclusive rights, some snow boots brand in the promotion of the if to use UGG trademark, DEX company to hold the corresponding legal liability. What Australia UGG or Yellow Earth, are false ". Yellow Earth to pour out one's endless grievances ugg boots sale, they said it was naked commercial defamation, they will study how to take legal action to protect their. JUMBOUGG Mr. Yuan also appears innocent face: had obviously been misleading to consumers, we hope to have a fair and reasonable competition environment. The storm together, the average customer service phone volume jumped 50%, to our normal business caused great interference. On this question, reporter segment Wing Ding law firm intellectual property lawyer Wang Lihua. King lawyer said, infringement and tort is two completely different ideas. If in the promotion of the use of " UGG " trademark, violations, and decided to sell fake goods, is clearly inconsistent with the facts. Judgement and must supply and combine. According to the report, only for the Commission is called a " MERINO WORLD UGG " brand, DEX company finds its apparent violations of their rights to exclusive use of trademarks. The reporter checked in Jingdong Mall, and Taobao store has sell. A subsequent query Australian intellectual property website and China Trademark network, in Australia for display on the website of the trademark application for " MERINO WORLD ", not with a "UGG", " Pending " in the state, has not yet been approved. The site was not found in the relevant registration information. King lawyer said, in China the use of trademarks to China registered trademark shall prevail. Even in Australia trademark with the inscription "UGG", does not mean that the use of the trademark in china. As to why only 1000 yuan of above high-end ugg boots brand being implicated in a large number of low-end, ugg boots brand did not concern, senior market personage to Mr. shows why, low-end ugg boots materials it is no such thing, and Dekkers did not compete in a range from the Dekkers bowl, can divide a cup of a thick soup then a few home. Even if the price of 1000 yuan, and Dekkers uggs laarzen, still a big slice of difference, price advantage obviously. King lawyer thinks, individual brand in the trademark use of illegal should not be implicated in the industry within the normal business. The point, against a practice biased. Due to historical reasons, " UGG " itself is a dual concept, from the purely online shopping search perspective, you very difficult to judge the consumer in order to "UGG " search goods, your heart is the brand name "UGG" or " UGG " category, in other words, consumers want to buy a pair of DEX. "UGG ", still want to buy a pair of boots?
 
Industry sources, Dex in rights to tough is known, has a number of countries in the global tort litigation, including in the United States put up a pageantry to prosecute a famous Australian ugg boots brand EMU. Legal experts warned, stick rights should be cautious. Not available in the dominant position, the rights, the result is likely to be right than before, infringement on. Xinhua special economic analyst Lan Jianping thinks, free market economy condition, full competition in the industry, make one branch alone big, can neither, nor reasonable cheap ugg boots. Multiple selection is a consumer rights. Ugg boots industry can, should also have a number of companies, a number of brand, participate in the healthy and orderly competition. Thus, ultimately benefit, benefit will be consumers and society as a whole.

. , , , ,